Why would Rupert Murdoch “apologize” for something that at first they claimed wasn’t controversial?

Posted On October 26, 2010

Question by Derek: Why would Rupert Murdoch “apologize” for something that at first they claimed wasn’t controversial?
I mean, he apologized for that cartoon in the New York Post, the same one they said was not controversial. If it wasn’t why not just stand by it then?

This is the same owner of FOX News (which doesn’t surprise anybody.) So why apologize for something they didn’t see as a problem?

I mean, there’s nothing wrong with two white cops shooting a “black” chimpanzee……….is it? Certainly people wouldn’t take that the wrong way, would they Republicans?

Best answer:

Answer by Obama is a Marxist
So, whats the problem?

Add your own answer in the comments!

Related posts:

  1. Rupert Murdoch: The Untold Story of the World’s Greatest Media Wizard
  2. Rupert Murdoch’s China Adventures: How the World’s Most Powerful Media Mogul Lost a Fortune and Found a Wife
  3. Rupert Murdoch ? the father of News Corp.: The empire continues to expand
  4. Citizen Murdoch: The Unexpurgated Story of Rupert Murdoch–The World’s Most Powerful and Controversial Media Lord

About The Author

Success

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *