Why would Rupert Murdoch “apologize” for something that at first they claimed wasn’t controversial?
Posted On October 26, 2010
Question by Derek: Why would Rupert Murdoch “apologize” for something that at first they claimed wasn’t controversial?
I mean, he apologized for that cartoon in the New York Post, the same one they said was not controversial. If it wasn’t why not just stand by it then?
This is the same owner of FOX News (which doesn’t surprise anybody.) So why apologize for something they didn’t see as a problem?
I mean, there’s nothing wrong with two white cops shooting a “black” chimpanzee……….is it? Certainly people wouldn’t take that the wrong way, would they Republicans?
Answer by Obama is a Marxist
So, whats the problem?
Add your own answer in the comments!